Difficulties and challenges for Etisalat ( Operation class) Essay

Difficulties and challenges for Etisalat ( Operation class) - Essay Example The Corporation deals with sensitive services such as the transfer of money services which requires alot of security. Etisalat is exposed to risks such as cyber criminals hence the need to seek new ways to get rid of such threats. Some individuals employed at Etisalat are not qualified for the work they are required to do at the Corporation. They lack the knowledge and skills in the services they are offering to customers because of lack of training. The Corporation does not offer training skills to their employees since they do not have enough resources,hence avoid sending staff outside the country to acquire more skills from the best. The world keeps developing with new security technologies frequently that requires Episalat as one of the biggest companies to follow the trend. This is a big challenge for the Corporation because the changes happen constantly and adapting to the situation is difficult since it requires money to buy the equipments and knowlege of the techniques required to operate the new equipments. There is a high demand for the services at Etisalat but they lack enough resources to meet the needs of their customers since they are located in many countries that require their best services. This is a challenge because the customers in countries with poor services blame the whole Corporation for the failure of one departments that offered the services. Some departments in the Corporation lack mannuals that contain the guidelines for security projects which makes it confusing for most staff members (Plunkett,2007). The available resources in Etisalat are not invested properly hence causing difficulties in the operation of the Corporation. The government own large shares at Etisalat and command any changes they want hence making it difficult for the Corporation to introduce new ideas in the business since it takes a long time for procedures to be approved. There is also poor communication because of the bureucratic nature of the

TEXTBOOK CJ2012 FAGIN-Explain a motion for discovery and for Essay

TEXTBOOK CJ2012 FAGIN-Explain a motion for discovery and for suppression - Essay Example Thus, any evidence, which the police gather in violation of the provisions of these amendments, becomes invalid in a court of law to secure a conviction. The defendant in a criminal case has to right to request to the court to instruct the prosecution to provide him or her all the materials that they have gathered as evidence in the alleged offence. This will help the defendant to understand the nature of the evidences that the prosecution will use to argue their case. Thus, an examination of these evidences will enable the defendant to prepare for the trial and prove his or her innocence. The courts in the US function with a view to ensure a free and fair trial to all citizens. Therefore, it is in the interest of justice that the defendant be given all opportunities to examine the evidences that the prosecution has collected against him. During the trial, the prosecution, who is already in possession of the evidence, will use these materials to argue their case to prove that the defendant has committed a particular offence. Hence, in the interest of natural justice, the defendant also must receive the opportunity to examine the evid ence so that he or she can prepare the defense accordingly during the trial. It is on this premise, to ensure fair trial, that the defendant is provided the right to the motion for discovery. The motion to suppress is another significant right offered to the defendants under the provisions of the law, to ensure a free and fair trial, through the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. This provision confers on defendants the right for a motion, requesting the court to direct the prosecution to suppress certain evidences that have been obtained through illegal means. The main issue at stake in Suppression Motions is whether police officers â€Å"obtained evidence in violation of a constitutional or statutory right† (Jorgensen 7). Thus, if the